Peter Obi’s Inhumanity To Peter Obi

By Olabode Opeseitan

MaTaZ ArIsInG
Dallas, Texas

Nigeria has a long tradition of politicians destroyed by their enemies. Mr. Peter Obi may be the first to be undone, repeatedly and almost cheerfully, by himself. Ahead of 2027, the man who built a movement on the promise of competence has become its own best argument against it. Every time he speaks without a script, he hands his opponents material they could not have manufactured. This is not man’s inhumanity to man. It is Obi’s inhumanity to Obi.

The Grass and the Grave
Asked at the Nigerian Bar Association’s 2026 conference to account for a 13‑month doctors’ strike in Anambra, Obi did not apologise. He offered a body count instead: “If the doctors are very effective, in 13 months there was no mass death.” It was meant to sound hard‑headed. It sounded like someone grading a public health collapse on a pass mark of survival rather than care.

Weeks later, pressed on Channels Television over which schools he built as governor, he reached for the Odumegwu Ojukwu University campus at Igbariam. “Seun, I cut the grass. What I mean, it was a bush. I levelled the bush.” Opponents did not need to invent a meme. He supplied the caption himself.

The question he didn’t answer
On Afia TV’s “Eastern Eye,” in an edition titled “State of the Nation with Peter Obi,” an audience member named James Eze asked Obi what he intended to do to encourage voters to protect their ballots in 2027. Obi thanked him for the question, then proceeded to answer one nobody had asked. “I’m now telling them, 35 million are expected to go under the hunger list now. We have actually moved from below 100 on the hunger list to 109 now, going to 150. In a short while, as we normally do, we will be number one.” The figures were familiar; he recites the same Global Hunger Index ranking and the same 35-million total on cue, regardless of the question put to him. What never arrived was any mention of apathy, vote-buying or rigging, the three forces that actually decide whether a ballot survives to be counted.

James asked how to protect a vote. Obi answered with a league table, and forecast, almost gleefully, that Nigeria would soon claim first place on it, a ranking no government campaigns for and no opposition leader should campaign on. Declining to credit a rival administration for genuine gains in growth or any other index is fair sport in opposition politics. Sounding pleased at the prospect of more Nigerians going hungry, so that his own prediction comes true, is not. The two questions never met, and neither, in that moment, did the candidate and the country he says he wants to lead.

An Arithmetic Problem
Obi’s brand rests on numeracy, on the claim that he, unlike the political class around him, actually reads the data. The data disagrees with him more often than his supporters admit. In July 2022, and again weeks later, he told Arise Television and a prayer gathering in Umuahia that Nigeria’s total exports were “under $30 billion.” Central Bank of Nigeria and National Bureau of Statistics figures for 2021 put the real figure at roughly $47 billion. Confronted with the gap, he recalculated live on air and conceded elsewhere that he sometimes gives “inaccurate figures.” His defenders often argue he was referring to non‑oil exports, but that is not what he said.

The same looseness with scale resurfaced on health. In a post‑election interview he declared that “Nigeria is the country with the highest infant mortality in the world.” United Nations Inter‑Agency Group estimates for the period show Sierra Leone, the Central African Republic and Somalia all ranking worse. Nigeria sat fourth. The underlying point was true. The claim he actually made was not, and it is the false claim that travelled.

The Brewery and the Family Firm
Few boasts have aged worse than Obi’s brewery story, and few controversies run deeper. In 2012, Anambra State put roughly ₦2 billion of public funds into Intafact Beverages, the Onitsha plant later absorbed into International Breweries. Corporate Affairs Commission records showed the resulting shareholding split as SABMiller with 82.5%, Anambra State with 10%, and a company called NEXT International with 7.5%. NEXT International was founded and, for years, run by Obi himself, through his family.

Former lawmaker Chudi Offodile sued, arguing that a sitting governor’s family firm acquiring equity in a deal he personally negotiated with state funds was a textbook conflict of interest, and demanded Obi’s resignation. Obi’s camp insisted he had resigned his directorship before the investment and personally held no shares. Obi told journalist Kadaria Ahmed in 2019 that “I benefited nothing. I did it for Anambra State.” The defence has never fully answered the simpler question of why a company bearing his family’s name needed to be a shareholder at all. Under the Code of Conduct rules, beneficial interest through a family firm is still relevant. On the separate matter of the investment’s value, Anambra’s own finance ministry put the holding at closer to $5 million in 2022, far below the figures Obi has cited in his own favour.

The Letter and the Offshore Company
In July 2025, after months of allegations from critics that he had quietly served the Abacha dictatorship, Obi told interviewers he had “never met General Sani Abacha” and had held no appointment under any government before becoming governor in 2006. To rebut the critics, he then published the proof against himself: a letter dated 24 April 1996, signed by Minister of State for Finance Abu Gidado, naming “Gregory Peter Obi” a co‑opted coordinator on the federal Task Force on Ports Decongestion. His clarification, that the role lasted two to three weeks and was purely civic, did not erase the contradiction between “never worked with any government” and an official federal appointment letter bearing his name.

The pattern repeated itself with the Pandora Papers. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists found that Obi, three years into his governorship, controlled an offshore company named Gabriella Investments Limited in the British Virgin Islands, set up through nominee directors designed to obscure ownership, and remained a director of a UK company for 14 months after taking office in apparent breach of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act. His defence, that he did not know family‑owned offshore interests required declaration, might be forgivable from a junior official. From a two‑term governor and former bank chairman, it reads less like an oversight than a confession that the rules were optional when inconvenient.

The Evidence He Never Had
For three and a half years, Obi insisted, through rallies, interviews and two failed court challenges, that he had won the 2023 presidential election, regardless of what the Independent National Electoral Commission declared or what the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal and the Supreme Court ruled. In October 2026, pressed by the BBC’s Madina Maishanu on whether he could substantiate the claim, Obi answered without his usual evasions. “Well, there’s no evidence,” he said. “Everything is not based on evidence.” He did not retreat from the underlying claim itself. “I won the election and that’s where I end,” he added.

The admission functioned as its own confession. A man who had built three and a half years of political identity, and now a 2027 campaign, on the premise of a stolen mandate had just told an international broadcaster, on camera, that the mandate rests on conviction rather than proof. Two courts had already told him as much in legal language; he had only to repeat it in his own words.

The Real Opponent
None of this erases Obi’s genuine critiques of Nigeria’s governing class. But strung together, the strike, the grass, the exports, the mortality figures, the brewery shares, the Abacha letter and the offshore company describe a candidate whose first instinct under pressure is to improvise, and whose second instinct is to supply the evidence that convicts him. Nigeria does not need to go looking for the man best placed to prosecute Peter Obi. He has already taken the stand, and this month, October 2026, he delivered the closing argument himself: there is no evidence, and that is where he stops.

#PeterObi
#BBC
#ndianambra
#2027Elections
#INEC

Charles Chukwuma Soludo
Chief Willie Obiano

1SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER NOW

Support MATAZ ARISING’ journalism of integrity and credibility.

Good journalism ensure the possibility of a good society, an accountable democracy, and a transparent government.

We ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble endeavour.

0.00USD

Amount
0.00

TEXT AD: To advertise here – Email ad@matazarising.com

LATEST POSTS