Nigeria at 66: The Agriculture-Industrial Revolution We Need for Prosperity

By Idowu Ephraim Faleye +2348132100608

MaTaZ ArIsInG
Dallas, Texas

Nigeria is 66 years old today as an independent nation. For 66 years, we have talked about our enormous potential, our natural resources, our large population, our fertile land and our strategic position in Africa. We have changed governments, written development plans, created institutions, borrowed money, discovered oil, built roads, established universities and introduced countless programmes. Yet, for the ordinary Nigerian, one question remains difficult to answer: after 66 years, why does a country with so much continue to struggle to provide enough food, enough jobs and enough opportunity for its people?

Perhaps the answer is not that Nigeria lacks resources. Perhaps the problem is that we have not successfully connected the resources we already have into one productive system. Nigeria became independent on October 1, 1960, but political independence was only the beginning of the journey. The real challenge of nationhood is economic independence: the ability of a country to feed its people, employ its citizens, produce what it needs, create wealth and give its young people a meaningful future.

This is why Nigeria must begin to look at its future differently. We need to stop treating food security, unemployment, poverty, rural development, industrialisation, youth development and the problem of out-of-school children as completely separate problems. They are connected. And one of the strongest ways to connect them is to build a modern agricultural economy that does not stop at farming, but moves from farming to processing, from processing to manufacturing and from manufacturing to a larger industrial economy.

The history of industrial development gives us an important lesson. The Industrial Revolution did not happen simply because somebody suddenly invented machines. Agricultural transformation helped create the conditions for industrialisation. When agriculture became more productive, it could provide more food, raw materials and markets. It could also release labour and create demand for tools, machinery, transportation and other services. The lesson for Nigeria is not that agriculture must mechanically come before industry. The lesson is that a productive agricultural system can become one of the foundations upon which industrialisation is built.

Nigeria has not fully made that connection. We have millions of farmers producing crops, but too often the farmer remains separated from the factory. A farmer produces cassava, but somebody else must discover what to do with it. A farmer produces maize, but the connection between the farm and the feed mill may be weak. Tomatoes are produced in large quantities in one season, yet inadequate storage and processing can turn abundance into waste. The country therefore loses value between the farm and the final consumer.

This is why our agricultural ambition must go beyond producing enough food for immediate consumption. Nigeria must produce enough food to feed its people and enough agricultural raw materials to supply industries. Cassava should not end with garri. Maize should not end with the grain market. Tomato should not end with the roadside trader. Oil palm should not end with crude palm oil. Yam should not end when it reaches the market. Every major agricultural product should be connected to a chain of processing, packaging, manufacturing, distribution and export.

The objective should be simple: farm to aggregation, aggregation to storage, storage to processing, processing to manufacturing and manufacturing to the market. Once that chain is built, agriculture stops being merely a means of survival and becomes an engine of industrialisation.

This is particularly important because Nigeria’s food problem is also an economic problem. When food becomes expensive, the poorest families suffer first because they spend a large share of their income on food. Businesses also feel the pressure because workers need higher wages while transportation and operating costs rise. The World Bank continues to identify low agricultural productivity, weak market connections, infrastructure gaps and food inflation as major challenges facing Nigeria. Agriculture remains the country’s largest source of employment, but much of its potential remains trapped in low-productivity and subsistence production.

The answer, therefore, cannot simply be to tell farmers to produce more. We must create the system that makes it possible for them to produce more profitably.

This is where Nigeria’s 774 local government areas can become extremely important. Instead of seeing local governments mainly as administrative structures, Nigeria can turn them into grassroots centres of economic production and agricultural development. The 774 LGAs already give the country a nationwide administrative structure. The question is how to make that structure productive.

Every LGA should have an Agricultural Development and Economic Centre. This centre should know the land, the soil, the water, the crops, the farmers, the farm sizes, the available machinery, the storage facilities, the processing facilities, the markets and the security conditions in the area. Nigeria’s agricultural census already demonstrates that agricultural data can be organised at LGA level. The National Agricultural Sample Census covered 767 of the country’s 774 LGAs, with the remaining areas affected by insecurity.

Imagine what would happen if every LGA had an accurate agricultural map. Government would know where maize grows best, where cassava is more suitable, where irrigation is possible, where livestock production can expand, where storage facilities are required and where a processing factory would make economic sense.

Neighbouring LGAs with similar agricultural conditions could then form production clusters. Ten or more nearby LGAs could specialise in particular crops or related agricultural activities based on soil suitability, climate, water availability and market demand. One cluster could focus on cassava. Another could specialise in maize and animal feed. Another could develop tomato production and processing. Another could focus on cocoa, oil palm, rice, yam, livestock or other products.

But government must not make the mistake of becoming the farmer. The purpose of the LGA agricultural centre should not be to replace farmers and private businesses. Its role should be to provide the intelligence, research, extension services, soil testing, training, infrastructure, financing mechanisms, mechanisation support and market coordination that make farming commercially productive.

The same principle should apply to tractors. Rather than distributing tractors as political gifts that may eventually break down without spare parts or maintenance, Nigeria could establish agricultural equipment service centres. Farmers or cooperatives would pay for ploughing, harrowing, planting and harvesting services. The revenue would help maintain the machines, pay operators and provide spare parts. Government would therefore create a sustainable mechanisation system rather than another short-lived distribution programme.

Water must also become a central part of this agricultural revolution. Nigeria cannot build a serious agricultural economy while depending almost entirely on rainfall. Every LGA agricultural plan should identify its water resources and possibilities for irrigation, water harvesting, small dams, drainage and solar-powered pumping. The objective should be to make agricultural production more predictable and, where feasible, allow farmers to produce beyond a single rainy season.

Then comes the question of land. Nigeria cannot afford to leave potentially productive land unmanaged while millions of people remain unemployed and food remains expensive. But this does not mean that every forest should be cleared and converted into farmland. That would create environmental damage and conflict over land rights.

Instead, Nigeria needs a national land-use and agricultural potential map. Protected forests, national parks, watersheds and environmentally sensitive areas must remain protected. Community rights must also be recognised. But degraded land and other legally available areas that are scientifically suitable for agriculture can be identified for productive use. Some areas can support conventional farming, while others can be developed through agroforestry, combining trees with crops such as cocoa, cashew, fruits, plantain and other suitable products.

The country could eventually build a national agricultural land information system that tells us not just where land exists, but what that land can produce, who has rights to it, what the soil contains, where water is available, how accessible it is and what market is closest to it. Land would then become a properly mapped economic resource rather than an opaque asset that is difficult for genuine farmers and investors to access.

But producing more food without storage would not solve the problem. Every agricultural cluster must therefore have aggregation centres, warehouses, drying facilities, cold storage and reliable transportation. Farmers should not be forced to sell immediately after harvest because they have nowhere to keep their produce. If we can reduce post-harvest losses, we can increase effective food supply without necessarily increasing the amount of land cultivated.

After storage comes processing. This is where Nigeria’s agricultural revolution becomes an industrial revolution.

Every major agricultural cluster should have processing capacity close enough to the farms to reduce unnecessary transportation and waste. The cassava cluster needs flour, starch and other processing industries. The maize cluster needs drying, storage and animal-feed industries. Tomato-producing areas need processing plants and cold-chain infrastructure. Oil-palm areas need modern processing facilities. Agricultural waste can also become an input for animal feed, energy, fertiliser and other industries.

Once processing starts, the employment opportunity expands far beyond the farmer.

Someone has to operate the machines. Someone has to repair the tractors. Someone has to maintain the irrigation pumps. Someone has to build processing equipment. Someone has to manage warehouses. Someone has to transport the produce. Someone has to package the finished product. Someone has to market it. Someone has to analyse the market. Someone has to manage the data. Someone has to test the quality of the products.

This is why agriculture can become one of Nigeria’s biggest employment engines if it is properly industrialised.

It also gives Nigeria an opportunity to rethink the problem of unemployed graduates. Instead of assuming that every graduate must find a government office job, Nigeria can train young people for the agricultural economy that the country needs. Some can become agricultural data analysts. Some can specialise in soil science. Others can study food processing, agricultural engineering, irrigation, machinery fabrication, storage, logistics, agricultural finance, marketing and quality control.

A small number of Nigerians can be sent abroad to learn advanced agricultural technology, processing and machinery. When they return, their job should not simply be to occupy offices. They should train thousands of others and help establish local centres of excellence. The purpose of foreign training should therefore be multiplication: one person trained abroad should be capable of transferring that knowledge to many Nigerians at home.

This same agricultural transformation can also become part of the answer to Nigeria’s huge out-of-school youth problem, particularly in the North. The answer, however, should not be to take children out of education and simply put them on farms. Basic education remains important. A child needs literacy, numeracy, health education and the basic knowledge required to participate fully in society.

What needs to change is the connection between education and productive life.

For younger children, education should remain the priority, with carefully supervised exposure to agriculture. For older adolescents, practical agriculture and vocational skills can be combined with basic education. For young adults who are already outside the formal school system, agricultural apprenticeship can become a serious pathway into employment and entrepreneurship.

A young person who has spent years outside formal education should not be told that his only option is to remain trapped in poverty. He can learn irrigation, livestock management, tractor operation, machinery repair, food processing, storage, marketing or farm management. He can become part of a cooperative and eventually operate his own agricultural enterprise.

The important thing is that agriculture must not become another name for poverty. We must teach young people how to run agriculture as a business.

That is why the agricultural development centre in each LGA should also become a youth skills centre. It should connect education with farming, technology, entrepreneurship and employment. A young person should be able to see a pathway from learning to skills, from skills to production and from production to income.

This is also where data becomes extremely important. Nigeria should develop a reliable digital farmer identity and agricultural database. Government should know who is farming, where the farm is, what is being produced, how many hectares are being cultivated, what inputs were used, what was harvested and where the harvest was sold.

Then agricultural policy will no longer be judged by how many bags of fertiliser were distributed or how many tractors were announced. We can ask better questions. How many hectares were cultivated? What was the yield per hectare? How much did the farmer earn? How much food entered the market? How much was lost after harvest? How much was processed locally? How many jobs were created? How much was exported?

Nigeria is already moving toward parts of this approach. A $500 million World Bank-supported agricultural programme approved in 2026 focuses on smallholder productivity, aggregation, post-harvest handling, agro-processing, improved market access, research, extension services and a national digital farm and farmer registry. That direction shows that the idea of connecting farmers to value chains is not merely theoretical.

Security must also be part of this transformation. A farmer who cannot safely reach his farm cannot produce at scale. Rural roads, communication, security, water and electricity are therefore not separate from agricultural policy. They are part of agricultural infrastructure. Areas affected by insecurity need a coordinated approach involving security agencies, local communities, conflict resolution and economic development.

Ultimately, the goal should not be to create more farmers who remain poor. The goal should be to create a productive agricultural economy that raises farmer income while reducing the cost of food for consumers.

If Nigeria gets this right, the effect will spread far beyond the village. Farmers will earn more. Food processors will have raw materials. Manufacturers will have local inputs. Transporters will have more business. Engineers will have machines to design and repair. Young people will have jobs. Banks will have productive businesses to finance. Government will have a broader tax base. Exporters will have products to sell. Consumers will have greater food security.

That is how an agricultural revolution becomes an industrial revolution.

After 66 years of independence, perhaps Nigeria’s greatest challenge is not discovering another source of government revenue. It is discovering how to make the millions of resources already within the country work together.

We have the land. We have the people. We have farmers. We have universities. We have scientists. We have engineers. We have a huge domestic market. We have millions of young people looking for opportunities. We have hundreds of local government areas that can become platforms for local economic development. We have an agricultural environment capable of producing a wide range of crops and livestock.

What we need is to connect them.

We need to connect land to farmers, farmers to machinery, machinery to production, production to storage, storage to processing, processing to manufacturing, manufacturing to markets and markets to consumers.

We need to connect education to skills, skills to employment, employment to production and production to prosperity.

We need to connect young people who currently see no economic future to an economy that gives them something productive to do.

And we need to connect Nigeria’s agricultural potential to an industrial future.

That is why the next phase of Nigeria’s development should not be another collection of disconnected programmes. It should be a national production system in which agriculture becomes the foundation of food security, rural development, youth employment and industrialisation.

The prosperity of Nigeria will not come simply because we have oil, minerals, land or a large population. Resources become wealth only when a country has the capacity to organise them into continuous production.

So, on this 66th Independence Day, perhaps the question we should ask is not simply whether Nigeria has fulfilled the dreams of its founders. The more useful question is whether we are finally ready to build the productive foundation that can make those dreams possible.

A prosperous Nigeria will be a Nigeria that feeds itself, employs its people, processes its own raw materials, manufactures more of what it consumes and sells more of what it produces to the world.

It will be a Nigeria where the farmer is not the poorest person in the value chain, where the young person does not see begging as his only option, where the graduate can find productive work outside government, where rural communities are connected to markets, and where agriculture is not treated as a programme but as an economic system.

After 66 years, Nigeria does not need another promise that prosperity is coming.

Nigeria needs a production system capable of creating prosperity.

And perhaps the most practical place to begin is the soil beneath our feet.

Idowu Ephraim Faleye is a freelance political writer based in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. +2348132100608

---

1SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER NOW

Email address:

Leave this field empty if you're human:

---

Support MATAZ ARISING’ journalism of integrity and credibility.

Good journalism ensure the possibility of a good society, an accountable democracy, and a transparent government.

We ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble endeavour.

TEXT AD: To advertise here – Email ad@matazarising.com

LATEST POSTS